Peer Reviewed Chapter
Chapter Name : Cognitive Science and AI-Driven Pedagogical Models for Dynamic Curriculum Development in OBE

Author Name : Anuradha Parasar , H. Anwer Basha

Copyright: ©2025 | Pages: 36

DOI: 10.71443/9789349552210-03

Received: WU Accepted: WU Published: WU

Abstract

The integration of AI and cognitive science in OBE was transforming traditional pedagogical approaches by enabling adaptive, data-driven curriculum development. AI-driven pedagogical models leverage machine learning, natural language processing, and real-time analytics to enhance personalized learning, automate assessments, and optimize instructional methodologies. Cognitive science principles, including cognitive load theory and metacognition, provide a foundation for AI-enhanced curriculum adaptation, ensuring alignment with competency-based education. This chapter explores the scalability of AI-driven learning environments, emphasizing the role of Open Educational Resources (OERs), AI-powered learning analytics, and subscription-based models in fostering cost-effective, inclusive education. It examines faculty resistance, ethical concerns, and technological barriers that hinder large-scale AI adoption in traditional academic institutions. The discussion extends to AI-augmented teacher roles, which redefine instructional strategies and student engagement within OBE frameworks. Future advancements, including neuroadaptive AI, immersive learning technologies, and blockchain-driven credentialing, are expected to further revolutionize AI-driven curriculum development. Addressing key challenges in scalability, data privacy, and algorithmic transparency be crucial for ensuring equitable and sustainable AI integration in global education systems.

Introduction

The integration of AI and cognitive science into OBE was revolutionizing traditional pedagogical models by introducing adaptive, data-driven curriculum development [1]. Conventional education systems often rely on static instructional methodologies that do not cater to the diverse cognitive abilities, learning speeds, and comprehension levels of students [2]. AI-driven learning models, underpinned by cognitive science principles, offer a dynamic alternative by utilizing machine learning, natural language processing, and predictive analytics to personalize the learning process [3]. These systems analyze real-time student performance data, adapting instructional materials and assessment methods to align with individual competency levels [4-7]. Cognitive science concepts, such as cognitive load theory and information processing models, provide a structured approach to optimizing AI-driven pedagogical strategies, ensuring enhanced knowledge retention and student engagement [8].

Scalability was a crucial consideration in the widespread adoption of AI-driven curricula, as educational institutions seek cost-effective solutions that can be deployed across diverse learning environments [9]. AI-powered OERs facilitate access to high-quality, adaptive learning materials while enabling continuous content updates based on evolving academic and industry requirements. AI-driven learning analytics further enhance institutional decision-making by providing actionable insights into student engagement patterns, learning progress, and curriculum effectiveness [10]. These analytics help educators and administrators implement targeted interventions, refine assessment strategies, and ensure alignment with competency-based education models [11]. The integration of subscription-based AI learning models also provides an economically viable alternative, enabling institutions and learners to access cutting-edge educational technologies without significant infrastructure investments.

The transformative potential of AI-driven education, its implementation in traditional academic institutions faces significant challenges [12]. Faculty resistance remains a critical barrier, as educators often perceive AI-based systems as disruptive rather than complementary to traditional teaching methodologies [13]. Concerns regarding reduced educator autonomy, job security, and the depersonalization of learning environments contribute to reluctance in AI adoption [14]. AI-powered assessments and content delivery systems require a redefinition of instructional roles, where educators transition from knowledge transmitters to facilitators of AI-enhanced learning experiences [15]. Effective faculty training programs and AI literacy initiatives are essential to bridge this gap, ensuring that educators can leverage AI-driven tools to enhance their pedagogical effectiveness rather than view them as replacements for human instruction.